Friday, July 30, 2010

Why Most Christian Music is Bad

Apparently, most Christian musicians just skipped over the many portions of the Bible that speak about the necessity for sincerity and excellence in our art. How about when David said, “Praise God according to His excellent greatness.” Doing your very best isn’t always good enough. The following are some of my major misgivings regarding mainstream Christian music:

The Music:

1) The music is cheesy and contrived. It is canned and cliché, and it abounds in either failed or successful attempts at the most emotionally manipulative of all compositional tropes: the lyrical and/or melodic “hook.” The music overflows with externally imposed affectations, most of which make clear that the artist desires to sound like another artist that has gained a listenership. Such mimicry usually results in a cheap and disingenuous copy of someone else’s sound. It is not wrong to incidentally sound like someone else, but only if your music demands it. But to impose a sound on your music in order to gain or maintain popularity is neither true to your art nor to the gospel.

2) Most of the music sounds exactly the same. How is this possible? If you go through the Psalms alone, you find so many different tones: contemplative, repentant, exuberant, depressed, angry, philosophical, etc. We know that the Psalmists did not employ only one style or only certain instruments because most of the Psalms have notes to the choir director indicating what form and musical instruments should be employed, and these can vary greatly and usually correspond to the “feel” of that particular Psalm. If your music all sounds similar in tone and approach, you have two lyrical options: avoid writing about anything that does not fit into that tone, or write lyrics that are incongruous with your music. Mainstream Christian musicians have done and continue to do both. There are huge portions of the Bible and human experience that Christian songwriters avoid altogether, and then there are other subjects that feel wildly misplaced when they are set to the same over-weening musical tripe.

The Lyrics:

1) Most of the lyrics are repetitive generalities irrelevant to the real experience of human beings. Some Christian listeners may mistake their fuzzy feelings for edification, but non-Christian listeners (what few have not already been estranged from “Christian” music) are not fooled even for a moment. In reality, general, abstract lyrics neither refresh the flagging church nor restore the lost world. Most Christian lyricists, as has been mentioned, simply avoid talking about issues that would convict. They don’t want people to leave their song “feeling bad.” If they do address matters that could turn unpleasant, they tend to salve the unpleasantness far too soon with some anthemic breakout chorus reassuring the listener that everything is peachy keen. But sometimes things just aren't peachy keen. Sometimes things are rotten. And the culprit is always sin. Christian lyricists need to grapple lyrically with doubt, uncertainty, pain, suffering, death, personal sins, the whorings of the church, the materialism of our age, etc. If they don’t know about those things from intimate experience, they have no business whatsoever writing music. They are bringing reproach on the name of Christ.

2) The lyrics that purport to “praise” God are worse than the lyrics about human experience. Repetitive, mantric generalities about God's greatness don't give a single person the vaguest idea of how God is great. Most songs about God seem more interested in the act of worship rather than the object of worship. “Here I am to bow down... here I am to worship... here I am to say that You’re my God.” So what? So you’re here. Who cares. We’re not here to focus on you.

But, you may say, the song goes on to praise God. It pretends to. But vague and general statements don’t convince God any more than they convince spouses. If a husband tells his wife over and over again: “You’re altogether lovely. You’re altogether wonderful to me,” eventually she is going to ask, “But how am I lovely? How am I wonderful?” The Song of Solomon, as well as the other praise literature in the Bible, must guide us. Solomon doesn’t just call his love beautiful. No, he creates some of the most imaginative metaphors ever conceived to describe every beauty of every part of his beloved's body (one of my favorites is that her temples are like pomegranates). Generalities purporting to praise God are not found in the Bible unless they are in the context of specific praise of God for specific deeds He has done or is doing, which deeds the artist takes special care to connect to both his and his listener’s real, present experience.

General praise does not instill a longing in an unbeliever to know a real God. Most non-Christians hear our general praise, and they think, “Well, if you know Him personally, why does it seem like you only know Him from a distance?” If I told you I was friends with a celebrity, how would I prove it? I certainly wouldn’t prove it by telling you things you could find out from a casual glance at your local grocery store tabloids. I would have to give you real details of my long-term interactions with the celebrity. The same is true of our relationships with God. If an unbeliever doesn’t believe in God, how is God-concerned tabloid fare going to convince him? It’s not. If a Christian is struggling with doubts, how are general statements about God going to bring Him certainty? They won’t. God wants specific praise, and if you can’t think of any specific praises, your relationship with God is probably shallow, and again, you have no business writing Christian music.

Conclusion:

Not many of us are to be teachers. This means that worship leaders and Christian artists will be and are held to a higher standard. We have to stop making music in order to get people to listen to it. Our responsibility is firstly to God! Whatever he demands of us, we must do. Our music should be composed to support the message (the whole message) that God has given us to transmit, no matter what negative impact that may have on our popularity or album sales. Our labor is not in vain if it is unto the Lord. You want to be successful in the eyes of God? Listen to Solomon: The fear of man brings a snare, but he who trusts in the Lord will be exalted.

21 comments:

  1. "Repetitive, mantric generalities about God's greatness don't give a single person the vaguest idea of how God is great." I 100% agree with this statement from your 7-30-10 blog. The repetitiveness of "You are wonderful" is maddening. This is also convicting when it comes to prayer. Many times our shallow relationship with and knowledge of God is evident in our prayers. Thinking about this has encouraged me to be more specific in praise when I talk to Him.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Finally someone said it!

    ReplyDelete
  3. "'Here I am to bow down...here I am to worship...here I am to say that You're my God.'" So what? So you're here. Who cares. We're not here to worship you. We're not here to focus on our own piety at the expense of God's glory.

    Brother, I understand your point but you must think about the intention of praise and worship. The majority of the time it is not to convert people to the Christian faith but rather ti strengthen the faith of existing believers. Repetition settles our minds and souls so we may more deeply enter into a relationship with our Lord. There are multiple forms of worship and this is just one of them.

    When we are singing, "Here I am to bow down...here I am to worship...here I am to say that You're my God" we are simply and most importantly reaffirming our belief in our Lord and He does care. God cares about the smallest things no matter how important us, as human beings, see them to be.

    People are called to different forms of spreading the faith and some that may be helping people either retain it, by praise and worship, or be converted by praise and worship. We not know the limitations that the Holy Spirit works through. Also, there are other artists who are in the secular music scene evangelizing to non believers.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I would suggest finding your way to the nearest Orthodox Church. The music is beautiful and profound; the worship is reverent and majestic and solemn and joyful and exuberant. It is not cool, hip, or sexy; it does not conform to the modern MTV fastfood culture. The Orthodox Church recognizes God Almighty for who He is and worships Him accordingly.

    I used to attend a modern, contemporary, Evangelical church and saw nothing even close to the worship I see and experience and offer to God every day in the Orthodox Church.

    None of the objections you list in this post apply to Orthodox worship music. Do yourself a favor and get into an Orthodox Church as soon as possible. You simply will not see real worship until you do.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Get this book, read it and see if what you are thinking lines up with what is happening. Hope it brings you joy.
    http://www.amazon.com/At-Crossroads-Present-Contemporary-Christian/dp/0877881286%3FSubscriptionId%3DAKIAJ3AR2O7JYNGTEXWQ%26tag%3D20-malltownusa2-20%26linkCode%3Dxm2%26camp%3D2025%26creative%3D165953%26creativeASIN%3D0877881286

    ReplyDelete
  6. You've got some good points, but it really feels like you're just raging. I can agree with you on the poppy things but when it comes to the worship songs I think you are generalizing. That being said, great post. I'm going to subscribe to your Blog.

    ReplyDelete
  7. You are talking about half of the Christian music chunk here. You are forgetting about the underground sector, which pretty much completely solves all of your complaints about Christian music.

    UnderOath
    Maylene and the Sons of Disaster
    For Today
    I Am Terrified
    Blindside
    The Chariot
    Oh Sleeper
    The Devil Wears Prada
    Flyleaf
    Haste the Day
    Anberlin
    Relient K
    Ivoryline
    Mewithoutyou
    The Almost

    There are really way too many to list that are the opposite of what you talk about in your blog. I suggest not listening to the radio anymore.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Thanks to everyone for commenting. I am specifically referring here to "mainstream" Christian music. I know there are many underground musicians that are doing it right (I produce some of them). To answer a few points:

    I am raging. You got that right. So did the prophets. But I ask forgiveness if I sinned in my anger. God calls us to be angry but not sin.

    I did not write this blog for personal reasons. My main concern is the glory of Jesus and how He is represented to the world and in and by the Church. I do not listen to the radio much, and when I do, it is not for pleasure or edification.

    Repetition is necessary in education, but not worship. God says specifically, "Let not your prayers be like those of the Gentiles, with vain repetitions..." You have only reiterated my point: that contemporary worship is overly concerned with the worshiper and his act of worship, and not enough concerned with the object of worship, God. Worship is not first for us. It is first for God. Or it is not worship.

    Thank you all for reading!

    ReplyDelete
  9. "Repetition settles our minds and souls so we may more deeply enter into a relationship with our Lord. There are multiple forms of worship and this is just one of them."

    Quite right, this us just one form of worship - one favored by New Age mantra chanters and Hari Krishna. It is not specifically Christian as far as I know. I get the use of a chorus, but this is not what you describe.

    Buyer beware.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I used to completely agree with you on these same points, but i found that most of my issues with Christian Music were in my own opinions and tastes in music in general. I didn't like christian music just cuz I was into indie folk music, which is also what I play. Then I soon turned to "week worship", saying that uncreative worship did not let the spirit flow. But as I continued to worship with these ideas, and trying to write my own "powerful and creative" worship; I always found my self stumped. I realized that worship is EVERYTHING to do with the heart. When I would hear a lame band play the same old songs the same old way, I would check out. But now I am firm in my belief that the reason I couldn't write the amazing worship that I longed to give to God was cuz I was a week worshiper. My worship was based on my personal tastes in music, not on how amazing I think God is. I don't think God wants our flattery, He wants our hearts. I could write the most beautiful song, but if it has no heart who cares? David wasn't a man after God own vocabulary.

    And for unbelievers, I don't think "good music" is going to change the world. It may lead a few individuals, but what about the rest?
    I believe only by the outpouring of the Holy Spirit and the power of God.
    Worship music is an obvious tool for helping people flow in the Spirit, but I don't think God is going to pour Himself out on mere creativity.

    ReplyDelete
  11. "many underground musicians that are doing it right"

    suggestions. please? :-)

    ReplyDelete
  12. I very much agree with the article. I have become increasingly passionate regarding these topics over several years now.

    Regarding vain, vague repetitions, I heartily agree. I've been saying to my wife in our arguments about Christian worship music, that saying "I worship you" is not ACTUALLY worshipping a person. Saying "I praise you" makes no practical sense whatsoever! Can you actually praise someone by stating that you are "praising" them? It seems absolute nonsense to me. To state that you are doing it, without actually ever doing it is ridiculous. You worship someone or praise someone by extolling his or her virtues, either in behavior or character. To start with saying "I praise you" seems a bit vain, but to never go beyond it is ludicrous. Nonsense…ridiculous…ludicrous…interesting. It seems I'm using plenty of strong words here. My apologies if it's excessive. I think Lori made a good point that musical worship intended to get us "in touch" with God through repetition may actually be very loose worship. It may "activate" our spirits, but in such a loose way that they may be directed toward anything. If we aren't actually directing our spirits toward our (one true) God, through specific truths about Him, we are in effect worshipping a false God (I'm reminded of A.W. Tozer's amazing book, Knowledge of the Holy). When in a new relationship (or, even better, when a person has a crush about another person), where the couple is in the infatuation stage, daydreaming about each other, they aren't usually setting their minds and hearts on an actual representation of the other person. They've seen just enough of the other person's behavior and character to create a whole image in their minds which suits their liking. In actuality, this may be like forming a "missing link man" out of a pigs tooth, as evolutionists did. The people involved are forming false versions of the other person in his or her mind. Unless that person restricts him/herself to the knowledge he/she actually possesses about the other person, the likelihood is very high that any imaginations he/she has will be false. Taking this risk is far more grave when it comes to God. To simply get in the "zone" and "feel" God is merely to open oneself up to vague spirituality. Eventually, you might be opening yourself up to the demonic. I imagine God would prevent true Christian from doing this, to some extent, but what about a seeker who is visiting a Christian church, feeling that they've "found God" by "feeling" him as a result of the thumping repetition of the music, of the manipulation of their emotions through that music.

    In regard to the opposition, I would however make one concession. I've been inclined to get upset when I've heard so much repetition, whether in songs or in prayer. After a bit I came to realize that in some cases it is necessary to have repetition in order to sort of slap ourselves out of complacency and to break through our shells of hard-heartedness. It's important to know where the line lines between vain repetition and edifying repetition. Much of our sins begin with forgetfulness, so much of what we need is reminder (i.e., repetition). The question beyond this is whether or not this line lies in different places for different people in the same setting. If it does, it would make this part of the discussion much more difficult.

    ReplyDelete
  13. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  14. In regard to Mark (not Minkoff), specifically, I'd say that, although worship music is (by definition) not intended to evangelize (though it may) it MUST be inherently worshipful (full of worship, rich with specific appreciation of God's character and behavior), and it SHOULD be strongly edifying. Worship is one of the most edifying things we can do. It sets our hearts upon God, and increasingly softens them once there.

    Regarding the Orthodox church in Matt's comment, I don't think abandoning ship from evangelical denominations is the solution. In fact, it's part of the problem (those who have perceived a problem in evangelical denominations and instead of seeking to work toward a solution have sought out the path of least resistance). I must temper this statement by saying that a person's leaving a church with shallow musical worship (I disdain the terms "praise and worship" being applied to music) is not necessarily a selfish act. If one is seeking to love God better, then that is a god thing. However, the two "chief" commandments are to Love your God, and to Love your neighbor. If you fail to love your neighbor, you fail to love God. If you fail to seek the solution of a problem that is strongly detracting from the edification of your brothers and sisters in Christ, and preventing deep worship of our Lord, YHWH, then you have in fact sinned by omission.

    In regard to the article in general, I have one major complaint. I would also caution that skillful musicality pertains not only to lyrics and general composition, but also performance talent/ability. Frankly, I was quite impressed and resonated very well with the article, until I began to hear the songs play on the page. The lack of skill/talent in singing demeaned the credibility of the article.

    In conclusion, I don't think your article presents an appearance of "rag[ing]" at all. You are most certainly firm, and I can imagine you have at times been angry in thinking about these concepts, but I don't think you've sinned at all in the writing of this article, at least not in anything you've written (I can't say anything in regard to sins of thought).

    ReplyDelete
  15. I really appreciate this post. I have been frustrated with this same topic for some time now and have found general apathy on the subject. Why is it that everyone "feels the Spirit" during the pre-planned, predictable bridge? Music is a powerful tool and quite frankly the majority of Christian worship musicians only use it for one purpose: making people feel good. (Again, where did acknowledging God's worth and beauty go?)

    We have the ideal; so why, then, are we blatantly copying popular music instead of exploring the variety in this incredible art? Is the Church to cater to emotions or to real people with problems which can be dark and difficult to solve? Have we forgotten that there is a book in the Bible called Lamentations?

    Again, thank you for this. As a music major and composer, this strikes me as something which needs much more attention but sadly too many of us expect only entertainment - even at the pulpit.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Are you using micah stout as an example. I hope so because I listened to two songs and they were horrible lyrically and musically. I agree with you about the shoddy music of a lot of christian bands, but I would like to take it in a different direction. Why should there be "Christian Music"? We are called to go out into all the world and preach the Gospel and having music specifically for Christians is not doing that. Non-Christians are turned off by Christian music because it is notorious for being terrible. Lets just get rid of the genre and all the bad artists who are popular simply because they are christian will disappear. You CAN be Christians in a band as opposed to a christian band. The only exception to this rant is worship music because that music has to be specifically for Christians.

    By the way, Relient K, Really? they don't write good music.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I came across this from a post on my friends fb. AMEN and AMEN. This needs to be preached. The entire counsel of God should be proclaimed in "worship" - which seems to be only defined by how it makes people feel. Trinity Hymnal rocks ;)

    ReplyDelete
  18. - Co-sign on mynameistim_689's post. I used to feel the same was as this post. God said in His Word that He desires our hearts. The Holy Spirit can be working on a believer's heart, leading them to *repeat* "You are holy, you are holy, you are holy, ..." for 5 minutes straight. Or to sing, "I worship you for you are God" over and over again for 5 minutes straight. NOT ONE OF US KNOWS THE HEARTS OF THE SONGWRITERS, SINGERS, NOR MUSICAL DIRECTORS BUT GOD. WHICH MEANS WE HAVE NO RIGHT TO SAY WHAT IS AND WHAT ISN'T WORSHIP--WE CAN ONLY SAY WHAT WE PERSONALLY DO AND DON'T LIKE.

    - Music inspired by the Holy Spirit--the Spirit that created all things--should be the most INNOVATIVE AND CREATIVE MUSIC EVER. Would any of you describe music made by Christians (in the U.S.? The world?) as the most creative, groundbreaking, envelope-pushing music you've ever heard??? (Sufjan Stevens, Bobby McFerrin Soul-Junk, Mineral are a few examples that come to my mind.)

    ReplyDelete
  19. You guys are great! Thanks for all the feedback. I was using Micah as a positive example, betterway86, but I appreciate that you have a strong opinion. Micah would have been the first to say, before he died in January, that he did not have a polished voice, and he did not consider himself a musician. But I think he was a good songwriter. Many people have initially balked at the quality of his voice, but later recognized the raw authenticity of it. Micah wasn't one to mince words, and his voice, though frail, was honest.

    As for "underground" Christian bands making good Christian music? Here are a few that I think are doing it pretty well. I don't like everything about all of these artists, but I think, in general, they are doing a commendable job:

    Sufjan Stevens (aside from some lyrical obtuseness), Anathallo (when they still made explicitly Christian music), The Mountain Goats (you'll love or hate his voice), Pedro the Lion (before he dropped off the deep end), Half-Handed Cloud (sometimes slips from child-like to childish, but generally good), The Danielson Family (some elements take some getting used to), J. Tillman (drummer from Fleet Foxes), Derek Webb (hit or miss), Cool Hand Luke (poppy at parts and praisy at parts, but sincere and sometimes great), The Sum (a little over-produced for my taste), Della (on Indieheaven), Lecrae (and many of the other Reach Records artists), and Shai Linne (and other Lamp Mode Records artists). This is a pretty short list. There are probably others that I can't think of right now.

    Also, my foundation should release the albums of three as yet unknown bands by the end of this year: Warbler, Brock's Folly, and Young Immortals.

    Thanks again to everyone for commenting. I welcome all the constructive feedback I can get!

    ReplyDelete
  20. B u t's comment brought up another issue for me. "NOT ONE OF US KNOWS THE HEARTS OF THE SONGWRITERS, SINGERS, NOR MUSICAL DIRECTORS BUT GOD. WHICH MEANS WE HAVE NO RIGHT TO SAY WHAT IS AND WHAT ISN'T WORSHIP--WE CAN ONLY SAY WHAT WE PERSONALLY DO AND DON'T LIKE." While this is certainly true, this defense can by no means stand in a congregational worship setting. If a songwriter has a very strong crisis in his or her life at a specific moment and writes a song about it, it is by no means appropriate for a congregational worship setting. How can 100, 500, 1,000, 5,000+ people all be having this "crisis" at the same point in time. Similarly, songs or prayers saying "we adore you" or "our hearts are full" or "we are so hungry for you" are entirely inappropriate to a congregational setting. How can you presume that everyone in the building has the exact same feeling as you do at this moment? Instead, let's focus on doing things that develop positive feelings, through our focus upon God which allows the Holy Spirit to work in us. Songs referring to the crisis experience of a songwriter are good inspiration by example (good for listening to in private or even in public), but we should not enter into insincere "worship." Of course, we are called to rejoice in the Lord, regardless of our feeling, but that does not mean pretending to have feelings we don't. That ACTUALLY means putting our focus on God and praising His character and behavior, thanking him for what He's done in our lives. Eventually our feelings fall in line with our rejoicing. I don't really think this happens when we pretend to have an emotion we don't actually possess. Ultimately, congregational worship (musical or otherwise) MUST be focused on God and not on ourselves, or else it will certainly be out of line with a large body of the congregation.

    ReplyDelete
  21. I know that there will be, as long as I live, a "Christian Mainstream". It will probably be there long after I am dead. I do believe it does damage to the church in so many ways. Yes it does make us look really pathetic (not that we need bad music for that). Yes, it is vain repetition and emotional indulgence. Yes, it may even be the worst musical genre ever! But, who is at fault for this? Where is the alternative? We are at fault. We should be building the alternative. Holy means "set apart", and the music should reflect that. How can it not if it is truly of God? How can it be set apart if it's formulaic, empty, and clearly a cheap imitation of what is "hot right now"? Even within the genre itself.

    There is no reason why an authentic Christian underground art blast shouldn't occur. In fact I think it is burgeoning. If we fail to feed it, if we tell our virtuoso sons and daughters to major in business because there is no money in music, we WILL be held accountable. It's time to feed this humble fire and set it ablaze across the globe. Can we even begin to imagine what God is capable of through his people? I get so excited just thinking about the power of the Holy Spirit and God given talent nurtured, chiseled, generation after generation, stronger and stronger...............WHOA!

    Then, Christian mainstream today ....................................................forgotten. With Gigli, Milli Vanilli, and Thomas Kinkade in the "Landfill of Discount Messiahs",........ forgotten.

    ReplyDelete